Technical note: Workload and transmission data for mobile C-arm fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Mobile C-arms may be used in fixed locations, and it is recommended that qualified experts evaluate structural shielding. PURPOSE: To assess clinical workload distributions for mobile C-arms used in gastrointestinal endoscopy and determine the Archer equation parameters for the C-arm beam spectra. METHODS: Consecutive (30 months) gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures on two Cios Alpha systems (Siemens) were retrospectively analyzed. X-ray tube voltage, tube current-time product, reference point air kerma (Ka,r), air kerma-area product (PKA), and fluoroscopic time were examined. The primary beam half-value layer (HVL) was measured with an ionization chamber and aluminum 1100 plates. Stray radiation fraction at 1 m from a scattering source (ACR R/F phantom) was directly measured. Monte Carlo (Geant4) simulation was performed to calculate the transmission of broad X-ray beams through lead, concrete, gypsum, and steel, with X-ray HVLs matching those of the C-arm X-ray beam. The transmission data were fitted to the Archer equation. RESULTS: The number of procedures (3509) was equivalent to 13.48 procedures per room per week. Dose quantities were 54.8 mGy (Ka,r), 18.3 Gy∙cm2 (PKA), and 7.8 min (fluoroscopic time) per procedure. X-ray beam irradiation events were recorded for 2906 (82.8%) procedures with 160,009 events, whose mA-minute weighted tube voltage was 91.0 kV and the workload was 0.68 mA-minute per procedure. The two rooms had a significant difference in the number of procedures per week, 17.3 (29) [mean (maximum)] and 9.6 (16), respectively. The stray radiation fraction was 9.7×10-4 (80 kV) and 1.25×10-3 (120 kV). Transmission fitting parameters were provided for the tube voltage (on average, 90 kV; high end, 120 kV) of the C-arm. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides workload and transmission data for mobile C-arm fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy, which indicates a need for structural shielding evaluation of the procedure rooms.

Neurointerventions on two generations of angiography systems: Recent systems reduce radiation exposure by half.

PURPOSE: Fluoroscopically-guided neurointervention may be associated with prolonged procedure time and substantial radiation exposure to the patient and staff. This study sought to examine technological features affecting the potential radiation exposure reduction of new angiography systems, compared to older systems, for neurointerventional procedures. METHODS: Consecutive neurointerventional patients (2020-2022) were retrospectively analyzed. The air kerma at the reference point (Ka,r) and kerma-area product (KAP) were compared between Artis icono and Artis zee (Siemens) using statistical analyses (two-tailed t tests), where P < 0.05 is considered significant. X-ray tube potential and copper filtration were examined. Tests with an anthropomorphic phantom (Sun Nuclear) on Artis icono were conducted and entrance skin exposure and x-ray spectral half value layer were measured. Effective spectral filtration was characterized by x-ray spectral modeling. RESULTS: The number of procedures was 1158 [median (range) age, 59 (7-95) years] on Artis zee and 1087 [60 (1-95) years] on Artis icono, without significant difference in age (p = 0.059) between cohorts. Ka,r was 925.4 (890.6-960.1) mGy [mean (95 % CI)] and KAP was 119.8 (115-124.5) Gy∙cm2 on Artis zee. The measures were 48-50 % lower on Artis icono, 440.5 (411.7-469.4) mGy (Ka,r) and 59.5 (55.4-63.6) Gy∙cm2 (KAP); while the difference in fluoroscopic time between the two generations of angiography systems was insignificant (p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: The newer angiography system, with updated hardware and software, was found to result in half the radiation exposure compared to older technology of the same manufacturer, even though fluoroscopic time was similar.

Cumulative radiation exposure from multimodality recurrent imaging of CT, fluoroscopically guided intervention, and nuclear medicine.

OBJECTIVES: To assess cumulative effective dose (CED) over a 4-year period in patients undergoing multimodality recurrent imaging at a major hospital in the USA. METHODS: CED from CT, fluoroscopically guided intervention (FGI), and nuclear medicine was analyzed in consecutive exams in a tertiary care center in 2018-2021. Patients with CED ≥ 100 mSv were classified by age and body habitus (underweight, healthy weight, overweight, obese), as per body mass index percentiles < 5th, 5th to < 85th, 85th to < 95th, and ≥ 95th (age 2-19 years), and its ranges < 18.5, 18.5-24.9, 25-29.9, and ≥ 30 (≥ 20 years), respectively. RESULTS: Among a total of 205,425 patients, 5.7% received CED ≥ 100 mSv (mean 184 mSv, maximum 1165 mSv) and their ages were mostly 50-64 years (34.1%), followed by 65-74 years (29.8%), ≥ 75 years (19.5%), 20-49 years (16.3%), and ≤ 19 years (0.29%). Body habitus in decreasing occurrence was obese (38.6%), overweight (31.9%), healthy weight (27.5%), and underweight (2.1%). Classification by dose indicated 172 patients (≥ 500 mSv) and 3 (≥ 1000 mSv). In comparison, 5.3% of 189,030 CT patients, 1.6% of 18,963 FGI patients, and 0.19% of 41,401 nuclear-medicine patients received CED ≥ 100 mSv from a single modality. CONCLUSIONS: The study of total dose from CT, FGI, and nuclear medicine of patients with CED ≥ 100 mSv indicates major (89%) contribution of CT to CED with 70% of cohort being obese and overweight, and 64% of cohort aged 50-74 years. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Multimodality recurrent exams are common and there is a lack of information on patient cumulative radiation exposure. This study attempts to address this lacuna and has the potential to motivate actions to improve the justification process for enhancing patient safety. KEY POINTS: • In total, 5.7% of patients undergoing multimodality recurrent imaging (CT, fluoroscopically guided intervention, nuclear medicine) incurred a dose of ≥ 100 mSv. • Mean dose was 184 mSv, with 15 to 18 times contribution from CT than that from fluoroscopically guided intervention or nuclear medicine. • In total, 70% of those who received ≥ 100mSv were either overweight or obese.

Patient follow-up for possible radiation injury from fluoroscopically-guided interventions: Need to consider high cumulative exposure from multiple procedures.

PURPOSE: Patient skin dose from interventional fluoroscopy procedures may exceed the threshold of tissue injuries and established guidelines recommend patient follow-up for air kerma at reference point (Ka,r) ≥ 5 Gy for individual procedures. Patients may undergo multiple procedures and skin injuries may be possible by cumulative exposure, even when individually insufficient to cause injury. This study sought to quantify the frequency of patients whose individual procedure doses are below 5 Gy but whose cumulative Ka,r is ≥ 5 Gy. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 37,917 consecutive procedures in interventional radiology and vascular surgery at a tertiary-care hospital between January 2016 and June 2021. Radiation dosage was retrieved from the fluoroscopy acquisition systems. For a patient receiving multiple procedures, but each with Ka,r < 5 Gy, cumulative Ka,r within 2, 7, 14, 30, 183, and 365 days was assessed. RESULTS: Nearly 1/3rd (37.4 %) patients underwent multiple procedures. With individual procedures of Ka,r < 5 Gy exclusively, 1.9, 4.4, and 5.6 in 1000 patients received cumulative Ka,r of 5-14.1 Gy from the procedures within 30, 183, and 365 days, respectively. From the procedures within 14 days, 1.3 in 1000 patients received cumulative Ka,r of 5-11.4 Gy; and from those within 7 days, 0.87 in 1000 patients received 5-9.1 Gy. In comparison, 4.3 in 1000 patients received Ka,r of 5-12 Gy from a single procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of guidelines on patient follow-up for multiple procedures, our study may provide good material for setting up such guidelines.